e-magazine
Innovative Diplomacy
PM's visit enriches China's cooperation with European partners
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Sci-Tech
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Opinion
Special> APEC China 2014 > Opinion
UPDATED: August 24, 2014 NO. 35 AUGUST 28, 2014
A Chinese-Style Asia-Pacific Partnership
APEC meetings lay the groundwork for enhanced economic cooperation
By An Gang
Share

The ASEAN-launched RCEP will include its member states as well as the six states with which ASEAN has existing FTAs—Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. The RCEP focuses on product trade, with an aim to build an integrated market through cutting tariff and non-tariff barriers.

At the 2014 annual meeting of the Boao Forum for Asia in April, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang expressed hopes that the RCEP negotiations would be finalized in 2015. He also stated that China is not opposed to the establishment of TPP, adding that RCEP and TPP can develop in parallel and promote one another.

The RCEP and TPP both cover most Asia-Pacific economies. Thus, upon the completion of negotiations either of them could become a foundational platform for the FTAAP.

When addressing economic leaders at the 2013 APEC summit last October, President Xi noted that APEC should play a leading and coordinating role in promoting an open environment for development in the Asia-Pacific. He urged inclusiveness, mutual benefit and win-win to advance regional FTA coordination, while preventing the Spaghetti Bowl Phenomenon, which refers to an intertwined mass of preferential trading arrangements and rules of origin—creating a web of interests entangled like a bowl of spaghetti.

The coming years will be a key stage in deciding whether the Asia-Pacific can establish an open trade order. Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Li Baodong said recently that "it is time to take action."

A boost for Sino-U.S. relations

On August 13, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said at the East-West Center in Hawaii that U.S. President Barack Obama will join APEC economic leaders' summit in Beijing this fall to focus on three major issues: promoting clean and renewable fuels, supporting small businesses and women's participation in the economy and expanding educational exchanges. The three key areas are consistent with Obama's domestic agenda, and are aimed at both the Democrat's midterm elections in 2014 and the 2016 presidential election.

Considering the U.S. mid-term elections, which will be held on November 4, at the request of the United States, China may postpone the APEC summit. Due to domestic issues, Obama has been absent from two consecutive APEC summits in the past two years. If he misses the chance to attend the summit for a third time, the international community will question whether the United States really cares about Asia. It would also have a negative impact on Sino-U.S. relations.

The Obama administration has put forward a widely publicized policy known as the "pivot to Asia." Washington's active promotion of the TPP negotiations and establishment of a set of new trade rules is one of the major pillars of the strategy. In his speech on August 13, Kerry said the United States now attaches greater importance to the Asia-Pacific than ever before, stating that the current administration will redouble its efforts to promote the strategy in the region over the next two and half years.

A rising China and the loss of its dominance in the region are the major concerns of the United States. In the past year, the United States has intensified its efforts to deploy weaponry systems in East Asia and strengthened its military alliance with Japan, Australia and the Philippines. It abandoned its previously neutral stance by showing support for Japan lifting its ban on the right of collective self-defense and interfering in maritime disputes between China and neighboring countries in the East and South China seas. These moves by the United States have had a negative impact on mutual trust.

In the United States, Obama's 2009 China tour was widely considered to have achieved little. Thus, Obama cannot afford to miss out on a second chance. The Obama administration knows that it must come fully prepared to reach an outcome that it can pitch to the public, especially in the fields of climate change, trade, and human rights.

However, Obama should also acknowledge that without a healthy and stable overall development framework for Sino-U.S. relations, his visit to China may not produce a fruitful outcome. During their meeting in California last year, the Chinese and U.S. presidents reached a consensus so as to avoid falling into a Thucydides Trap—that is, to prevent a rising power from challenging the established power. This November, President Obama will have an opportunity to demonstrate his sincerity by adopting mutually beneficial measures.

The author is an op-ed contributor to Beijing Review

Email us at: liuyunyun@bjreview.com

   Previous   1   2  



 
Top Story
-People's Democracy
-Taking a Bite Out of Crime
-Eurasian Innovation
-Special Coverage: Premier Li Keqiang Visits UK, Greece
-Striving for Equality
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved