e-magazine
Culture and Communication
After a decade of development, Confucius Institutes have become an essential platform for promoting understanding between China and other countries
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Sci-Tech
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
China Reform
Special> APEC China 2014
UPDATED: November 7, 2013 NO. 45 NOVEMBER 7, 2013
Bold Deep-Seated Reforms
Commitment to transparent, efficient startups registration and inclusive market economy headline reforms
By Lan Xinzhen
Share

FREE MARKET: People line up for enterprise registration at the business service hall of the Shanghai Pilot Free Trade Zone on October 25 (PEI XIN)

The Chinese Government released a range of reform and opening up policies, as is customary, ahead of the Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), which runs from November 9 to 12 and will set the nation's reform agenda for the next 10 years. This year, the corporate registration system was included in the reform package.

On October 25, Premier Li Keqiang hosted an executive meeting of the State Council, and gave five specific instructions for reforms of business operations.

These measures indicate another major reform of the modern corporate system.

"By widening market access and establishing a transparent and efficient modern company registration system, we aim to further streamline government administration, create fair competition and support smaller businesses, especially innovative enterprises," Xinhua News Agency reported Li as saying at the meeting.

Encouraging startups

As China's first corporation was published in 1993, the modern corporate system has been in place for a mere 20 years. At that time, China adopted a legal capital system. That is to say, companies had to pay registration capital in full. Moreover, startups were required to ensure that the value of corporate assets was equivalent to registered capital.

It was not until 2005 that the legal capital system was replaced with an authorized capital system, which didn't demand stakeholders to pay registered capital in full. This system also reduced the minimum requirement of registered capital for limited liability companies and joint stock companies to 30,000 yuan ($4,900) and 5 million yuan ($820,500), respectively. This greatly lowered the threshold for startups and boosted the enthusiasm to invest.

Nonetheless, the old corporate registered capital system has lagged behind the economic change and entrepreneurial environment. Therefore, it can no longer meet the demands of innovative, small and micro-sized enterprises. As countries across the world try to create a favorable institutional environment for startups, such thresholds are virtually handicaps for entrepreneurs.

In 2009, within the scope of related laws, rules and regulations, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce began to carry out a pilot program of corporate registration system reforms in Beijing, Shanghai and south China's Guangdong Province.

In Pudong District, Shanghai, the requirement for registered capital has been completely eliminated, though measures like centralized registration have yielded satisfactory results.

The newly released company registered capital system also needs to be justified through pilot program experience.

Zhang Liqun, a research fellow from the Development Research Center of the State Council, argued that the reforms indicated the government had shifted from examinations and approvals to supervision, and would significantly restrain administrative forces from interfering in the market. In the future, it will be easier for entrepreneurs to start a company, while the government will be stricter in monitoring corporate operations.

1   2   Next