e-magazine
Charting the Course
China reviews the year gone by and sets new goals accordingly
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Sci-Tech
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Forum
Print Edition> Forum
UPDATED: January 26, 2015 NO. 5 JANUARY 29, 2015
Should the Ban on Surrogacy Be Lifted?
Share

Lin Minyu (www.rednet.cn): Tempted by the prospect of a quick buck, some university students have engaged in the business of selling ova in the name of donation. Before they get involved, it is unknown whether these university girls, who are highly educated and supposedly possess an above-average capacity for moral judgment, have second thoughts on entering this apparently lucrative industry.

Of course, it's possible that they are bedazzled by the gaudy propaganda of illegal agencies. Instead of informing the girls of potential pitfalls, these underground surrogacy agencies promise that the practice entails no risk. In addition, it does appear to be a shortcut to relative wealth. As a result, quite a number of girls fall into the trap set by illegal agencies. Their response to the advances made by such agencies somewhat implies college students' ignorance of, even indifference to, their own health and legal and ethical matters. To some extent, it also reveals a lack of relevant education on the part of schools.

In order to attract often-vulnerable young women to do business with them, illegal agencies have to advertise themselves. Therefore, the question remains: How has such information managed to enter campuses and be disseminated among girls without coming to the attention of the authorities? Why again is the issue being brought to light only after prolonged media exposure?

In any case, the impressionable girls who want to make easy money by selling their egg cells are the real victims at the bottom of this black business chain. A cursory investigation would reveal that, adding to the many offenses carried out against campus students, the offenders tend to locate and groom their "agents" in the university setting. Therefore, rooting out existing criminal networks on campus would appear important in the fight against underground surrogacy.

Qianxi (www.iqilu.com): Despite the fact that surrogacy is illegal in China, this underground market has continued to expand as demand is omnipresent. In this illicit market, quite a number of girls in their early 20s go so far as to provide ova and even "rent" their womb. Underground surrogacy agencies, which are overly focused on making money, never inform the girls of the huge risks inherent in this undertaking. This dangerous practice may lead to infertility for some unfortunate girls. It is likely that should they be informed of the potentially terrible consequences, many of them would think twice.

At present, the health authorities only have the right to supervise hospitals, medical institutions and the medical workers there. When dealing with websites and underground surrogacy agencies, we need policing as well as the collaboration of departments overseeing industry and commerce. Meanwhile, the lack of legal repercussions that could deter and appropriately punish underground surrogacy businesses also makes the task of cracking down a difficult one. Thus, to stamp out the underground surrogacy industry, we must have explicit regulations, tough penalties and efficient cooperation among relevant departments.

A moral dilemma

Lian Hongyang (Beijing Times): Absolutely permitting and absolutely forbidding surrogacy are both measures that will engender risk.

In the first instance, conventionally speaking, a child calls the person who gives birth to him or her "mother." The mother is the one who provides the ovum, gets pregnant and bears a child. However, this longstanding relationship has been called into question with the introduction of surrogate technology. The separation of parents in the legal sense from the definition of the role in the hereditary sense poses big challenges to the law and traditional morality. There have been cases where the surrogate mother has gone back on her initial word and claimed that she wanted to keep her baby instead of receiving payment. Say you were a judge, how would you deal with such a case?

In the second case, surrogacy is absolutely forbidden from a legal standpoint. For the sake of the continuance of the human race, as well as carrying on one's family name and bloodline, the desire to conceive a child is natural and healthy from genetic and psychological perspectives. For various reasons, some couples are unable to give birth to children. For those couples who would dearly love to have a child of their own, infertility is a cause of great misery. When modern medical technology is available to help them with the issue, but such technology is expressly forbidden, they will naturally feel both miserable and desperate. As hospitals do not provide surrogacy services, illegal agencies become the only avenue for couples caught in such a predicament.

Whether or not to grant surrogacy legal status is, in the final analysis, a question regarding the conflicts between technology and ethics. As a point of fact, assisted production is nothing new. Take the technology involved in the creation of test tube babies for example. Initially, this technology was subject to wide opposition, but today, more and more people have come to accept it. Similarly, surrogacy should be properly made use of, so that it can help make people's lives better. It is thus of vital importance to standardize this practice using legal means and make explicit the procedures and even legal consequences involved in the use of surrogate technology. In some countries, restrictions on surrogacy are loosening. Practicing it in a discreet way may eventually become lawful.

   Previous   1   2  



 
Top Story
-Empowerment Through Infrastructure
-Special Reports: APEC China 2014
-Protection at Home
-A Weaker Union
-Will the 'China Miracle' Continue?
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved