e-magazine
Looking to the Two Sessions
China's growth model, pollution and corruption are just a few of the major issues to be discussed
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Forum
Print Edition> Forum
UPDATED: March 3, 2014 NO. 10 MARCH 6, 2014
Is It Time to Reform the Dual-Track Pension System?
Share

Yu Fenghui (Zhengzhou Daily): For years, the discussions and debates on China's pension system have been unceasing. Now, the two major issues are the huge shortage of pension funds and also inequality concerning distribution.

Nowadays, civil servants' pensions in many countries around the world are higher than ordinary people's. Studying civil servants' pension systems elsewhere in the world will help to improve China's current pension system.

The fact that in China civil servants don't need to pay premiums for their pension is often a topic of complaint. In Germany for example, civil servants don't need to pay premiums for unemployment benefits and annuities, which is also the case in some other European countries. However, it must be pointed out that it is common practice in many other countries, including developed countries, for civil servants to pay premiums for their pension. This seems an irreversible trend, as some European countries that do not demand their civil servants do so are considering changing the situation. An important reason is that these countries are now facing huge financial pressures in the aftermath of the sovereign debt crisis. As a result, they are considering changing the current social security system that adds additional strain to their funds.

Civil servants' pension in the United States and Germany may be slightly higher than that of enterprise staff. However, the actual amount of money civil servants receive after retirement is affected by many factors, such as the period of time they serve as government workers. Therefore, to compare the figures of their pension is not an accurate way to form a comparison.

The key is to compare the pension replacement rates in different countries, which show the level of pensions during retirement relative to earnings when working. The rate for civil servants in the United States is lower than 60 percent, in Germany, it is 72 percent, and in Japan, it is 50 percent. In China, however, the rate is above 90 percent. There, civil servants don't need to pay premiums for their pension, but they still enjoy the highest pension replacement rate in the world.

Zhang Liwei (21st Century Business Herald): In terms of salaries alone, civil servants in China do not earn so much. In Beijing, for example, where the living cost is much higher than in most places in the country, civil servants' incomes are low, but they have the privilege of buying houses at a much lower price, and in this way, the disadvantage of their low incomes are somewhat made up for by this privilege. In small cities, civil servants' incomes tend to be above average. The middle class in China's medium-sized and small cities are mainly composed of civil servants, as well as staff at monopoly enterprises or government-sponsored organizations.

Although some posts offer low pay, more and more young people continue to compete for job opportunities as civil servants. They know that once taking a position with the government, without competition and elimination and with rich pensions, they can enjoy a comfortable life.

However, once power is strictly controlled and corruption is severely reduced, we have to face the reality that civil servants' salary is quite low, or at least that it is not high. This may be part of the reasons why corruption is so hard to stamp out in China.

The current unfairness concerning the dual-track pension system comes from the pension replacement rate for civil servants, which is much higher than that for enterprise employees, causing huge gaps between different groups. The reform should first lower the pension replacement rate for civil servants and require them pay their share of pension premiums, and at the same time enterprise retirees' pension levels need to be raised, so as to narrow the pension gap. Given that in some large and medium-sized cities, civil servants' salaries are not so high, if their pension is sharply cut overnight, there might be some resistance from civil servants.

Civil servants are actually common government workers who are supposed to serve the people, in China and other countries alike. As they already possess certain administrative and fiscal powers, civil servants' salaries are often set at a fair level in most countries. It is not a job that you can rely on to become a millionaire, and sometimes, when the country falls into fiscal crisis, your income and welfare is the first to be affected. However, in China, due to the deep-rooted idea that government workers are all officials, it's easy for people to feel angry about civil servants' high pensions. China is now trying to develop itself into a modern country, so it's necessary to let its civil servants realize that they are not superior to others and their job is to serve the people. It's thus reasonable for them to receive pensions at a lower level.

Email us at: zanjifang@bjreview.com

   Previous   1   2  



 
Top Story
-More Expectations
-Spending Appropriately
-Crossing the Cultural Divide
-Finding 'Friends'
-Protecting Consumers
Related Stories
-Balancing out Pensions
 
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved