e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Forum
Print Edition> Forum
UPDATED: February 4, 2013 NO. 6 FEBRUARY 7, 2013
Should Standing Tickets Be Full Price?
Share

Yang Gongzhen (opinion.china.com.cn): The current system of standing ticket sales is pretty odd. The official response is that, if these fares are made cheaper, trains will become overloaded. It's a ridiculous argument. The railway department knows exactly how many standing tickets it can sell to avoid danger.

The Ministry of Railways is a government body with a duty to serve the public. The Railway Passenger Transportation Regulations explicitly regulates the pricing of hard seat and berth tickets, but contain no rules related to standing rates.

It is widely believed that halving standing rates is reasonable to match both price and service. On the other hand, some worry it might attract more passengers, which could disrupt operations. Perhaps such concerns are baseless. However you price it, trains can only transport a set amount of people at one time.

It's not the first time that the issue has come to the fore. In 2007, due to the summer holiday travel peak, bullet trains from Beijing to Tianjin and Shijiazhuang began selling standing tickets at the same rate for seats.

Is the problem really so difficult to solve? Maybe we can have a look at how other countries deal with the situation. In Britain, instead of paying for standing tickets, passengers can choose to travel at any time either sitting or on their feet. Of course, this system is built on the basis of full transport capacity, which is different from Spring Festival travel in China that incorporates the largest-scale human migration in the world. Calls for reduced fares are increasing, showing public awareness on the fairness of travel. The railway authorities should give a clear response to such calls.

Deng Haijian (Xi'an Evening News): With the approach of the Spring Festival, calls resound for the slashing of travel rates. Every year, the country's railway services sell a large number of standing tickets at full price. It's clear that fares and service quality don't correlate.

Standing tickets have been around for ages, but this doesn't mean they are fair. From either a market economy or consumer rights perspective, charging those who stand the same as those who are seated is bizarre.

Anyone who has traveled at peak times understands the terrible ordeal of movement and trying to get out of someone's way, particularly during long journeys. Dropping prices could offer some measure of comfort. However, there are currently no fixed regulations that deal with fixing prices and services.

The limited amount of standing tickets can by no means justify high prices. Railway authorities have the social responsibility to fulfill transport demands and make travel as affordable as possible.

Dear Readers,

Forum is a column that provides a space for varying perspectives on contemporary Chinese society. We invite you to submit personal viewpoints on past and current topics (in either English or Chinese).

Email us at: zanjifang@bjreview.com

Please provide your name and address along with your comments.

   Previous   1   2  



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved