e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Nation
Print Edition> Nation
UPDATED: May 16, 2011 NO. 20 MAY 19, 2011
Extravagance of Reputation
Liquor scandal at Sinopec exposes the absence of effective supervision on state-owned enterprises
By YIN PUMIN
Share

 

DAMAGED IMAGE: The building of Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. stands in the center of Guangzhou, south China's Guangdong Province. The company's former General Manager Lu Guangyu was demoted on April 25 for buying expensive liquor with company cash for personal consumption (TIAN JIANCHUAN) 

China Petrochemical Corp. (Sinopec), Asia's largest refiner, came under fire in mid-April after one of its subsidiaries was exposed to have purchased large quantities of expensive liquor for its head's private use.

On April 25, Sinopec held a press conference, announcing the demotion of Lu Guangyu, General Manager of Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. who it said was responsible for the extravagant bills worth 2.59 million yuan ($399,000). It also ordered Lu to pay 131,100 yuan ($20,170) for the liquor he consumed.

According to Sinopec's investigation, Lu seriously violated the company's regulation in decision-making, which is "collective discussion and consultation for decisions concerning key matters, appointment of key leaders, arrangement of key projects and usage of large funds."

Lu's unauthorized decision to purchase expensive liquor with company cash damaged the image of Sinopec and caused negative impacts on the company's business, said Fu Chengyu, Chairman of Sinopec, at the press conference.

Abuse of power

 

 (LI SHIGONG)

 

SMOKING GUN: Online postings on April 11 show Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. had spent a huge sum of money on expensive liquor, triggering public concern on possible corruption involved (TIAN JIANCHUAN) 

The scandal came to light on April 11, when a self-proclaimed insider at Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. posted photocopies of four invoices signed by the company with combined value of 1.68 million yuan ($259,000) on Tianya.cn, a popular online forum, showing the company had spent the money on expensive alcohol.

The postings said Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. had bought upscale liquor worth 2.59 million yuan in three different batches since September 2010.

The purchases included 30 bottles of 50-year Moutai, 30 bottles of 30-year Moutai, 60 bottles of 15-year Moutai and 360 bottles of non-vintage Moutai. Moutai is one of the most famous and expensive spirit brands in China. A bottle of 50-year Moutai sells for about 22,000 yuan ($3,386) and a bottle of non-vintage Moutai sells for more than 1,000 yuan ($154).

The postings showed the company had also bought 696 bottles of imported wines worth 630,720 yuan ($97,083). They included 17 bottles of Chateau Lafite Rothschild produced in 1996, which is priced at more than 10,000 yuan ($1,540) a bottle in China.

The postings said Lu decided to buy the wines and planned to use them at business banquets or give them out as gifts.

Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. on April 12 confirmed the purchases, but spokesman Xu Tao said the liquor was destined to be resold at stores in Sinopec's gas stations.

Netizens did not buy the explanation, saying such expensive liquor was unlikely to be sold out at gas station convenience stores.

Reporters with Xinhua News Agency contacted people familiar with business operations of Sinopec's gas stations in Guangdong, but the interviewees said they had never seen or heard the liquor was available for sale there.

The Beijing Morning Post cited anonymous sources with Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. saying Lu, who had previously worked in Sinopec's Guizhou branch, had selected Moutai as the main wine to be used for business receptions after being transferred to the Guangdong branch in 2009.

The disclosure of extravagant liquor bills soon made Sinopec a target of public anger, especially at a time when China's fuel prices are at record high levels.

On April 7, China increased retail gasoline and diesel prices for the second time this year, a move that benefited Sinopec, which has been lobbying for higher fuel prices, or state subsidies, to hedge losses caused by soaring international crude oil prices.

China's gasoline prices have doubled since March 2005, rising from 3.92 yuan ($0.60) per liter to 7.85 yuan ($1.21).

Net profits of Sinopec in 2010 rose 13.7 percent from one year earlier to 71.8 billion yuan ($10.51 billion), according to its statement filed with the Shanghai Stock Exchange in March.

The public blamed the company for extracting too much profit and demanded Sinopec disclose why the liquor was bought.

"Sinopec said it must raise gasoline prices to offset rising costs, while drinking Moutai in an air-conditioned office," said an online posting.

In response to the tirade of criticism, Sinopec issued a statement on April 14, saying it had sent a team to probe the alleged purchases and promised to publish the results as soon as possible.

The statement said those responsible would be punished if they were found to have violated any laws or Party discipline.

Before April 25, the investigation team twice visited Sinopec Guangdong Oil Products Co. It finally concluded Lu had bought the liquor in company cash for personal consumption.

On this basis, Sinopec decided to demote Lu from his post.

Many netizens have expressed disapproval of the punishment meted out to Lu.

They doubt about Sinopec's claim that the liquor scandal is an individual matter. Many believe that the case reflects rampant abuse of power and public funds among SOEs.

"All forms of extravagance are rooted in absence of effective supervision," said Yu Pengyi, a professor at the School of Finance and Economics of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.

Gu Xiaoming, a professor at the School of Humanities of Fudan University, said Sinopec needs to open up its accounts.

"The top leaders must stand up and apologize to the public immediately when a scandal breaks. This misplaced punishment only shows a lousy corporate culture and slack management," Gu said.

1   2   Next  



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved