e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Forum
Print Edition> Forum
UPDATED: August 31, 2009 NO. 35 SEPTEMBER 3, 2009
Is Drunk Driving a Felony?
Share

 

(LI SHIGONG) 

Drunk driving, a major killer in China for decades, may soon incur harsher penalties for offenders. Several high-profile alcohol-related traffic accidents in recent months have triggered a nationwide debate on whether driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) should be subject to the Criminal Law.

On June 30, in Nanjing, capital of east China's Jiangsu Province, a drunk driver killed five people, injured four and damaged six cars when he was behind the wheel.

A sport utility vehicle killed a 16-year-old girl on the night of August 4 in Hangzhou, capital of east China's Zhejiang Province. The driver was found to be driving drunk.

In 2008, 73,484 people died in China as a result of traffic accidents. Almost 20,000 of those deaths resulted from drunk driving.

Some attribute the growing trend of alcohol-related traffic accidents to ineffective punishments. The Road Traffic Safety Law requires that confirmed drunk drivers be detained for 15 days when nothing serious happens and be forced to pay a fine of 2,000 yuan ($300). When a drunk driver causes a traffic accident, the penalty includes imprisonment between three and seven years.

Some lawyers are appealing to revise the Criminal Law, saying that drunk driving should be made into a felony. Their suggestion has been supported by a majority of netizens in a recent online survey.

Other lawyers say that, even if the drivers are sentenced to death, road safety will not be better protected. Tough penalties may have a deterrent effect in the short term, but the long-term solution, they say, is to cultivate rule-abiding awareness among drivers.

More severe punishment needed

Li Long (Pengcheng Evening News): The Road Traffic Safety Law explicitly forbids drunk driving, but in reality DUI offenses are reported everywhere. Due to a lack of uniform standards, the penalty for drunk drivers varies in different regions. For example, in cases of drunk driving with fatalities, drivers who were accused of breaking traffic laws and regulations would be sentenced to at most three years in prison, but those who were charged with endangering public safety would be sentenced to death.

The current Criminal Law should be revised to stipulate that DUI constitutes a felony. In the United States, if a drunk-driving accident leads to the loss of life, the driver will be accused of "murder in the second degree." We should also reinforce the punishment.

Zhang Guangjun (Procuratorial Daily): In China, drunk driving now causes tens of thousands of traffic accidents and 50 percent of traffic deaths.

In modern society, laws, especially the Criminal Law, need to embody the spirit of tolerance, but this does not necessarily mean that criminals can be exempt from punishment. While also safeguarding the basic rights of criminal drivers, it's more important to protect law-abiding citizens against the threat posed by drunk drivers.

Wu Renshou (www.newsssc.org): Traffic offenses fall into three categories in the current Criminal Law of China—average road accidents that carry a punishment of less than three years in prison, hit-and-run that brings imprisonment of three to seven years and fatal hit-and-run that brings imprisonment of seven to 15 years. The Chinese legal system has been too lenient on traffic offenses.

Although DUI is banned in the Road Traffic Safety Law, the law still fails to prevent DUI offenses from happening again and again. The root cause is that DUI has not been criminalized separately.

For those fatal traffic accidents, many drivers have been accused of endangering public safety using dangerous means, which is hard to realize in practice. The crime of endangering public safety using dangerous means is subject to intention, and it is hard to give evidence that a suspect deliberately meant to commit the offense.

The improvement in the road traffic situation and the reduction of DUI offenses are directly connected with law enforcement. If too loose, DUI offenders could simply settle their cases by paying money and receive a lenient sentence; some offenders may even escape from criminal responsibility. If this is allowed to be the case, we will see more and more DUI offenses in the future.

The recent spate of DUI offenses has taught us that we have lost our principles when dealing with those offenders.

Cars are becoming more and more popular for household use, which unfortunately adds to DUI offenses. Decreasing it from happening and protecting the public should be a major concern that relevant departments are forced to tackle.

I believe China should add DUI crime to its legal system and punish offenders more severely. Only through this practice can the public be protected and DUI be prevented.

Yang Tao (Qilu Evening News): Cars are convenient tools, but they can also mean danger. The fact is that drivers will become less capable of controlling their vehicles if they have become impaired by alcohol. From a legal perspective, drunk driving endangers public safety. It is thus totally acceptable for those who drive drunk to take criminal responsibility, no matter if they are caught in traffic accidents or not. Then a large number of drunk-driving-related traffic accidents could be prevented.

Legal provisions alone are not enough to punish drunk driving. More important is strict law enforcement. Otherwise, the law is useless no matter how severe the consequences it prescribes.

1   2   Next  



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved