e-magazine
Quake Shocks Sichuan
Nation demonstrates progress in dealing with severe disaster
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Forum
Forum
UPDATED: January 9, 2012 NO. 2 JANUARY 12, 2012
Should Tobacco Researchers Be Selected as Academicians?
Share

(LI SHIGONG)

On December 8, 2011, the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) selected 54 academicians. Xie Jianping, whose research focuses on adding Chinese herbal medicine to cigarettes to reduce tar content, was on the list.

Xie, 52, is widely known for his research on low-tar cigarettes and serves as the deputy head of a tobacco research institute under China National Tobacco Corp., China's tobacco monopoly and the world's largest cigarette company. Xie's election has ignited great controversy.

Supporters say people shouldn't discriminate against researchers in controversial fields. Xie does not encourage smoking but has done his best to reduce its harm. The tobacco industry is a big one and China cannot eliminate it now.

Opponents decried him as a "tobacco academician" or even "killer academician." They argue that based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), low-tar tobacco advertising is fraudulent and misleads the public, and that it's impossible to reduce the risks of smoking by picking low-tar cigarettes. Xie's successful election was criticized as a shame for science, and his research criticized for helping the tobacco industry make profits.

Unfair criticism

Li Qing (Wuhan Evening News): Xie shouldn't have suffered from questions and criticism. It's not fair to him. First, he is not a scientist bought over by tobacco companies but has been a tobacco researcher for a very long time.

Second, what he does is not promoting smoking but is reducing the harm of smoking to the greatest extent. Shouldn't he be praised for trying to do so? If he can play a positive role in protecting people's health by developing low-tar cigarettes, why can't he be elected as an academician?

Han Qing (Yangtze Evening News): We shouldn't mix science with morality and take out our complaints and anger on an innocent individual. Decrying Xie as a "tobacco academician" or even "killer academician" is moral criticism and is beyond science. If we want to judge whether low-tar is effective in reducing the risks of smoking, we should observe data and statistics of experiments.

So far as I know, the election system of the CAE doesn't restrict candidates' research fields. Besides, only academicians can vote for candidates without collecting public opinion. If people have complaints about those rules, they can discuss them with the CAE and suggest revising them. But it's a totally different issue from Xie's election. People shouldn't have criticized Xie based on rules that they assume appropriate. Also, they shouldn't have criticized Xie as if they are more noble than him.

Wang Guorong (Qianjiang Evening News): Smoking is bad for health. Therefore, we do need research on how to reduce the risk of it to the greatest extent. It's unrealistic to eliminate the tobacco industry within a short period of time or to ask all smokers to quit as soon as possible. If smoking can't be banned for now, isn't it a good thing to research how to reduce its harm? Before being elected, Xie received many national prizes and has been an outstanding contributor for China's tobacco system for 19 years. He didn't encourage people to smoke but has made efforts on how to reduce its harm. There are hundreds of millions of smokers in China, and studies on how to reduce the harm of it are quite necessary.

If you have an opinion on smoking, you shouldn't take your anger out on Xie. It's not right to give him such harsh criticism.

1   2   Next  



 
Top Story
-Too Much Money?
-Special Coverage: Economic Shift Underway
-Quake Shocks Sichuan
-Special Coverage: 7.0-Magnitude Earthquake Hits Sichuan
-A New Crop of Farmers
Most Popular
在线翻译
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved