e-magazine
The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
World
Nation
Business
Finance
Market Watch
Legal-Ease
North American Report
Forum
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Health
Science/Technology
Lifestyle
Books
Movies
Backgrounders
Special
Photo Gallery
Blogs
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Web-magazine
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue
eBeijing

Forum
Forum
UPDATED: January 5, 2009 NO. 2 JAN. 8, 2009
Can Shopping Vouchers Boost Consumption?
Share

Whether in the short or long term, there are many other ways to stimulate consumption, such as tax reductions and subsidies to farmers and low-income families. All these are able to bring immediate returns. Apart from improving the social security system, breaking up monopolies and improving the market economy system will also help restore people's confidence in consumption.

Chen Jian (Xi'an Evening News): Shopping vouchers may not play the vital role in stimulating consumption as the government expects, because they cannot satisfy people's real consumption demand for commodities such as housing. Due to underdeveloped social safety nets and the growing consumer prices, many Chinese are unlikely to live as free a life as Americans do.

Furthermore, the issuing of so many vouchers may well result in black market operations. For example, in Taiwan, many people cash in their vouchers through unlicensed dealers and deposit the money in banks.

A 100-yuan voucher is unable to fulfill the obligation to boost internal consumption and it is just a way for the government to return benefits to the public.

Deng Yuwen (Oriental Morning Post): According to Mundell's proposal, every Chinese citizen can receive less than 1,000 yuan worth of vouchers. Quite possibly, some people will sell their vouchers for cash. So it's hardly to say that the vouchers can remarkably shore up consumption.

Instead of vouchers, I believe it's more useful for the government to use the money to improve people's livelihoods, for example, raising annuities for the retired and increasing living allowances for low-income urban households. There is also an urgent need to provide farmers with a well-developed social security system and pay off defaulted wages of teachers and migrant workers.

Booming consumption is the foundation for sustainable economic growth, while consumption is related to employment. It's important for the government to get rid of the outdated concept that only investment in basic infrastructure construction will stimulate domestic demand. The economic stimulus package must pay more attention to industries and programs capable of creating a huge number of jobs and public services like health care and education.

Dear Readers,

"Forum" is a column that provides a space for varying perspectives on contemporary Chinese society. We invite you to submit personal viewpoints on past and current topics (in either English or Chinese).

E-mail us at byao@cipg.org.cn

Please provide your name and address along with your comments.

 

   Previous   1   2   3  



 
Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Most Popular
 
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved