The Hot Zone
China's newly announced air defense identification zone over the East China Sea aims to shore up national security
Current Issue
· Table of Contents
· Editor's Desk
· Previous Issues
· Subscribe to Mag
Subscribe Now >>
Expert's View
Market Watch
North American Report
Government Documents
Expat's Eye
Photo Gallery
Reader's Service
Learning with
'Beijing Review'
E-mail us
RSS Feeds
PDF Edition
Reader's Letters
Make Beijing Review your homepage
Hot Links

cheap eyeglasses
Market Avenue

Cover Stories Series 2013> China's Shipbuilding Industry> Archive
UPDATED: August 12, 2013 NO. 33 AUGUST 15, 2013
Trimming the Excess
Reducing overcapacity is a must for China to transform its economy
By Lan Xinzhen

Industries including steel, electrolytic aluminum, flat glass and shipbuilding are also facing serious excess capacity. At the end of 2012 the utilization rates of the four industries were only 72 percent, 71.9 percent, 73.1 percent and 75 percent, respectively—far lower than international averages.

"Excess capacity reflects the structural problems in China that emerged during its industrialization," says Wang.

Lu Zhengwei, chief economist with Industrial Bank Co. Ltd., said the Chinese Government is changing its pursuit of economic growth away from speed and scale and more toward quality production. The government hopes various industries can move toward sound and sustainable development through the creation of products of high added value.

However, surplus capacity is dampening the enthusiasm of enterprises to change their growth models, which has become a serious challenge for China.

Lu said the new government can tolerate an economic slowdown that may result due to shutting down companies with excess capacity. The shutdown of these companies may curb growth in the already sluggish manufacturing industries, but Lu believes the Central Government will not launch a new stimulus package as long as the economic growth does not fall below 7.5 percent.

Role of the market

Zhang Qianrong, a researcher with the Economic Forecast Department of the State Information Center, said the problem of surplus capacity extends from traditional industries to emerging industries such as the photovoltaic industry. Moreover, surplus capacity is of structural and systemic characteristics, therefore solving the problem isn't so easy.

According to Zhang, the MIIT's order this time combines industrial, fiscal, land and environmental protection policies to reduce excess capacity. All these policies can be effective to some extent to curb blind expansion of the involved industries, but these policies could only be stopgap measures without the cooperation of the market.

Zhang said whether the government orders the shutdown of excess capacity with laws and regulations or encourages shutdowns with credit, tax or price incentives, the point is to let the market decide resource allocation.

That means limiting the impulse of local governments to spend on big and wasteful projects. Zhang said one way to curb overspending is to change the way officials are evaluated for their performance. Local officials are evaluated based on GDP growth, which nudges them toward blind investment projects.

When reforming the assessment system, China should also improve how it distributes tax revenue for spending between central and local governments. Tightening the purse strings would ultimately result in a weaker impulse for investment. The means by which the Central Government allocates subsidies, tax refunds and concessional loans should be transparent to the public.

"Letting the market play its role and leaving the government to build and protect market rules will create an environment for fair competition, trim overcapacity and advance the upgrading of the country's industrial structure," Zhang said.

He said the government should adopt different measures in tackling different types of overcapacity. To the enterprises with outdated technologies, small scales or illegal production, the government should close them down in accordance with state laws and regulations and prevent them from resuming production when market demand and prices rise. For those industries with low-quality excess capacity caused by industrial structural problems, the government should support the development of high-quality capacity and eliminate poor-quality through credit, tax and price policies. Finally, for those with overcapacity caused by low purchasing power and inadequate effective demand, the government should guide enterprises toward more advanced technologies to create more high-end goods.

Lu said the ultimate way to eliminate outdated capacity is through market competition. The government mainly uses administrative measures to eliminate excess capacity, making a list and timetable for shutdowns and ordering local governments to follow through. But under the pressure of maintaining GDP growth and ensuring employment, some local governments scoff at the idea.

"The government has been tackling overcapacity for years, but the situation in some industries has not significantly changed," said Lu. "Without involving the market, we won't see a decrease in capacity. The ultimate way to eliminate outdated capacity is to let the market do its job."

Email us at: lanxinzhen@bjreview.com

   Previous   1   2  

Top Story
-Protecting Ocean Rights
-Partners in Defense
-Fighting HIV+'s Stigma
-HIV: Privacy VS. Protection
-Setting the Tone
Related Stories
-Economic Transformation:Quality Over Quantity
Most Popular
About BEIJINGREVIEW | About beijingreview.com | Rss Feeds | Contact us | Advertising | Subscribe & Service | Make Beijing Review your homepage
Copyright Beijing Review All right reserved